Board Thread:Watercooler/@comment-26402117-20180802120149/@comment-24757753-20180827094158

Nice work!

I wonder the purpose of the "Open source code" point? If "open source" is used there literally (i.e. referring to source which is available/readable, but may or may not be freely licensed), then this could make sense. However, if "open source" is referring to code which is freely licensed (seems more likely), then re-use is likely already permitted by the license (assuming a CC BY-SA 3.0 compatible license, of course) and explicit permission would be unnecessary - it's already granted by the license.

Also, regarding "Code hosting" point: some scripts/stylesheets use resources (libraries, iframes, fonts, etc.) loaded from CDNs or elsewhere. I assume this point is meant to refer to loading entire scripts from outside the wiki, so a clarification might be useful there.