Board Thread:Code Review/@comment-1757994-20151023054248/@comment-24473195-20151024105310

Alright, I just tested out both scripts, and these were my results on community central (possibly the worst offender of dups):

=
========================== Community central 2015/10/24 Hard refresh Baseline (none loaded) 41 requests 85.2 KB

--Satzie Version-- 234 requests 953KB transfered 1048 files found

--Original dup checker 135 requests 726 kb 924 files

=
==========================

Clearly Satzie version returns more files, it also requires a whole lot more requests to complete its check.

I think that it might be better to load a few results maybe around 50 or so, and a button to load more on demand or maybe some sort of progress bar (which is quite complicated in this scenario).

Your version is certainly better as the aim is to return as many results as possible. We'll just need to review the code for security purposes and merge it if necessary.

I think VSTF can still edit javascript pages here, so if there's consensus for it, they can make the changes.