Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-24473195-20150815154410/@comment-5590118-20150818145717

It also really makes sense to use GitHub as the main peer-review system as it is dedicated solely to this purpose. It makes it incredibly easy to stay up to date with code, track issues, monitor pull requests, and even manage versions. GitHub should definitely be something that is considered.

If GitHub is utilized here is roughly how the main development cycle would look:

This ensures that all of the tools necessary to properly review code are present where the code is actually being reviewed. GitHub would act as the testing and reviewing environment while Dev wiki itself would act as the production phase where users would actually get the script from. This ensures that the end user is getting working code that has also been rigorously checked over.

Using GitHub in combination with Dev wiki is a far superior solution as opposed to any shoddy peer-review system Wikia could ever hope to throw up.