Board Thread:Watercooler/@comment-5590118-20150701035141/@comment-3032314-20150703205825

Dessamator wrote: I'm not sure if using a pseudo-namespace is a good idea ("Lua").

That came straight from Shining-Armor's mockup. I'm cool with putting documentation wherever.

Dessamator wrote: I'd much prefer it modules be put in the modulename/doc namespace that way we don't generate a huge number of pages simply for modules.

That would be ideal, yes. Unfortunately, as you pointed out earlier, "we don't have the automatic /doc transclusion that wikipedia[sic] has."

Dessamator wrote: Some [modules] are so small they may be documented by using comments.

Every module can be documented using just comments, but that isn't the point here. Again, as you pointed out earlier, "Documentation for developers isn't the same as docs for end-users."

Dessamator wrote: I've been putting tests in /testcases not tests. Although I can move them if need-be, but I was simply using wikipedia's approach.

Either way is fine with me, but /tests is a bit shorter.

Dessamator wrote: On a side note, it may be a good idea to adopt wikipedia's module sandbox idea (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module:Sandbox). I see a lot of unnecessary modules in module namespace.

That's probably a good idea, but could you define "unnecessary"?