FANDOM


m (In neither case did you "add anything" to the discussions. It's also considered common sense not to respond to old discussions, kindly stop restoring this edit.)
(Partly undid revision 41824 by SuperSajuuk (talk)—I did add to the second discussion; however, I removed my first discussion, as it, like you said, did not add to anything.)
Line 70: Line 70:
   
 
::::::Anyone whose javascript knowledge is at that level is '''not''' someone one has to worry about messing things up inadvertently. ;) — <span style="font: bold 125% Garamond;">[[User:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#DC143C">Spike</span>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto#top|<span style="color:#000000">Toronto</span>]]</span> 06:35, December 15, 2014 (UTC)
 
::::::Anyone whose javascript knowledge is at that level is '''not''' someone one has to worry about messing things up inadvertently. ;) — <span style="font: bold 125% Garamond;">[[User:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#DC143C">Spike</span>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto#top|<span style="color:#000000">Toronto</span>]]</span> 06:35, December 15, 2014 (UTC)
  +
{{ri|6}} Some people may use scripts in order to vandalize. Undoing the renaming of a bunch of category pages can be hard, especially if the person or people undoing do not use a bot or a script.<br><font face="Papyrus"><font color="#0020C2">―</font><b>[[User:PapiDimmi|<font color="#0000A0">PapíDimmi</font>]]</b> <small><font color="#571B7E">(</font><b>[[User talk:PapiDimmi|<font color="#4AA02C">talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/PapiDimmi|<font color="#4AA02C">contribs</font>]]</b><font color="#571B7E">)</font></small></font> 15:25, July 13, 2016 (UTC)
   
 
== Error code ==
 
== Error code ==
Line 128: Line 129:
   
 
== Why piping?! ==
 
== Why piping?! ==
  +
Why is it “piping” the categories it changes on the changed categories’ constituent pages? For example, see http://sp.wikia.com/?diff=1658655
   
<s>Why is it “piping” the categories it changes on the changed categories’ constituent pages? For example, see http://sp.wikia.com/?diff=1658655 </s>
+
This raises serious issues:
  +
# The righthand-side of the pipe in a category is used to specify '''sort order'''.
   
<s>This raises serious issues: </s>
 
# <s>The righthand-side of the pipe in a category is used to specify '''sort order'''. </s>
 
   
+
#* Thus, the “Cindy Lou Who” page (see '''[http://sp.wikia.com/?diff=1658655 example]''') categorized as
#* <s>Thus, the “Cindy Lou Who” page (see '''[http://sp.wikia.com/?diff=1658655 example]''') categorized as</s>
 
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
<s><b><code><nowiki>[[Category:Characters with antlers|Characters with a antlers]]</nowiki></code></b></s></blockquote><s>means that on the “Characters with antlers” page, it files not by “cindy …”, but by “characters …” </s>
+
<b><code><nowiki>[[Category:Characters with antlers|Characters with a antlers]]</nowiki></code></b></blockquote>means that on the “Characters with antlers” page, it files not by “cindy …”, but by “characters …”
#* <s>“cindy” and “characters” are alphabetically close, but suppose that the page being categorized thusly were instead called “Thomas the Tank Engine” </s>
+
#* “cindy” and “characters” are alphabetically close, but suppose that the page being categorized thusly were instead called “Thomas the Tank Engine”
   
   
#** <s>the page would slot in under the C’s — as in “characters” — instead or under the T’s — as in “Thomas”. </s>
+
#** the page would slot in under the C’s — as in “characters” — instead or under the T’s — as in “Thomas”.
#* <s>It’s really up to each wiki’s categorization policy to determine the sort order of its articles.</s>
+
#* It’s really up to each wiki’s categorization policy to determine the sort order of its articles.
# <s>It is counterintuitive to use a pipe to continue to show the category on the page as it was — in this case, the incorrect "characters with a antlers” — especially since “as it was” was wrong and renamed for that reason.</s> &larr; <span style="font: normal 85% Courier;">(It doesn't really do this anyway: it's all about sort order right of the pipe. :P)</span>
+
# It is counterintuitive to use a pipe to continue to show the category on the page as it was — in this case, the incorrect "characters with a antlers” — especially since “as it was” was wrong and renamed for that reason. &larr; <span style="font: normal 85% Courier;">(It doesn't really do this anyway: it's all about sort order right of the pipe. :P)</span>
# <s>Compounding this issue, editors at our wiki have begin copying the method — unnecessarily piping categories — yet having zero understanding of the consequences of piping them. Moreover, the two sides of the pipe often bear no resemblance to each other, or any relation to the page on which it is placed! For example,</s><blockquote><s><b><code><nowiki>[[Category:Horror films|Turtle McGurtle]]</nowiki></code></b></s></blockquote><s>on a page about ''Friday the 13th''! You can imagine the chaos this is creating.</s>
+
# Compounding this issue, editors at our wiki have begin copying the method — unnecessarily piping categories — yet having zero understanding of the consequences of piping them. Moreover, the two sides of the pipe often bear no resemblance to each other, or any relation to the page on which it is placed! For example,<blockquote><b><code><nowiki>[[Category:Horror films|Turtle McGurtle]]</nowiki></code></b></blockquote>on a page about ''Friday the 13th''! You can imagine the chaos this is creating.
 
Thanks. — <span style="font: bold 125% Garamond;">[[User:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#DC143C">Spike</span>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto#top|<span style="color:#000000">Toronto</span>]]</span> 13:06, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 
Thanks. — <span style="font: bold 125% Garamond;">[[User:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#DC143C">Spike</span>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto#top|<span style="color:#000000">Toronto</span>]]</span> 13:06, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
   
Line 150: Line 150:
 
::'''@Foodie:''' It should just replace the category, no pipe. So, in the example above,<blockquote><b><code><nowiki>[[Category:Characters with a antlers]]</nowiki></code></b></blockquote>would just become<blockquote><b><code><nowiki>[[Category:Characters with antlers]]</nowiki></code></b></blockquote>without the extra ''a''. This is essentially how one would do it if one were doing it manually. (By the way, on one wiki, we use sort order a lot, most often in the form<blockquote><b><code><nowiki>[[Category:{{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}|{{SUBST:SUBPAGENAME}}]]</nowiki></code></b></blockquote>to ensure that the category pages list the entries correctly. Anyway, thanks for fixing this! :) — <span style="font: bold 125% Garamond;">[[User:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#DC143C">Spike</span>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto#top|<span style="color:#000000">Toronto</span>]]</span> 15:14, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
 
::'''@Foodie:''' It should just replace the category, no pipe. So, in the example above,<blockquote><b><code><nowiki>[[Category:Characters with a antlers]]</nowiki></code></b></blockquote>would just become<blockquote><b><code><nowiki>[[Category:Characters with antlers]]</nowiki></code></b></blockquote>without the extra ''a''. This is essentially how one would do it if one were doing it manually. (By the way, on one wiki, we use sort order a lot, most often in the form<blockquote><b><code><nowiki>[[Category:{{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}|{{SUBST:SUBPAGENAME}}]]</nowiki></code></b></blockquote>to ensure that the category pages list the entries correctly. Anyway, thanks for fixing this! :) — <span style="font: bold 125% Garamond;">[[User:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#DC143C">Spike</span>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto#top|<span style="color:#000000">Toronto</span>]]</span> 15:14, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
   
{{ri}} It’s official ==> I’m an idiot. :$ — <span style="font: bold 125% Garamond;">[[User:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#DC143C">Spike</span>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto#top|<span style="color:#000000">Toronto</span>]]</span> 15:53, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
+
{{od|2}} It’s official ==> I’m an idiot. :$ — <span style="font: bold 125% Garamond;">[[User:SpikeToronto|<span style="color:#DC143C">Spike</span>]][[User talk:SpikeToronto#top|<span style="color:#000000">Toronto</span>]]</span> 15:53, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
   
 
== Links to category on page ==
 
== Links to category on page ==

Revision as of 15:39, July 13, 2016

Template:Talkpage

Bug

I noticed that this script adds the "Rename" button to every drop-down menu with the 'wikia-menu-button' class, including the Contribute menu. My suggestion would be to change
$('.wikia-menu-button .WikiaMenuElement').append(...
to
$('#WikiaPageHeader > .wikia-menu-button .WikiaMenuElement').append(...
so that it only targets the Edit menu.

RyaNayR (talkcontribs) 08:09, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

REALLY late, but thank you! — Foodbandlt (talk) 06:39, December 22, 2014 (UTC)

Removal/Delete functionality?

What would be nice is if there was a way to *not* give a new name. Perhaps by leaving the New Category field blank, or however it can be coded, it would then *remove* the Old Category entry from pages, replacing it with nothing, and in effect simply removing Outdated/Unnecessary Cats. Combined with the "Delete old Cat" function, and it we'd have it all. --Love Robin (talk) 13:41, April 4, 2014 (UTC)

I love this suggestion! :) — SpikeToronto 13:53, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
MassCategorization has the mode to remove categories. – Ozuzanna 14:04, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
Going to agree with Oz. I hate to say import two scripts, but this is a very specific script and others have already invented the wheel for what you described. — Foodbandlt (talk) 15:00, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
Hmmm … one more script to load … *groan* … my poor little iPad is going to up and die under the strain … :'( — SpikeToronto 15:17, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
UPDATE: Well, I’ve given it a try and, unless I’m doing it incorrectly, MassCategorization for removing categories is not quite what Love Robin and I had in mind. In my attempt, I wanted to de-categorize all pages in a particular category. Then, when the category is resultantly empty, I would just delete the category page; or, better yet, the script would. However, the script requires that, in addition to selecting remove and inputting the category name to be removed, I have to input a list of every page populating that category. Why? The system already knows every page that populates that category. I understand that a blank line is the script’s clue that it has reached the end of the list and to stop running. So, something would need to be input into the list box, that we cannot just leave it empty. To that end, could we device some special “codeword” that we input instead of a list, a codeword that signals to the script that it is to perform the de-categorization on all the pages in the category? Thanks! — SpikeToronto 15:23, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
Have you tried using the "Add category contents" button? Also I don't want it to auto remove categories after giving the category name for all of them, as the user may only want to remove a select few. – Ozuzanna 16:06, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
If the user only wanted to remove a select few, he’d list them. ;) Plus, that’s why I suggested some unique tag that, when placed in the list box, tells the script to act on all pages in the category. Thanks! :) — SpikeToronto 22:09, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
P.S. I haven’t tried the “Add category contents” button. I’ll do that now. I’m sure that’ll do the trick! Thanks! :) — SpikeToronto 22:09, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
That's a good idea, and I'll keep it in mind. – Ozuzanna 22:41, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── First, mea culpa: I didn’t really understand how the interface was supposed to work. It wasn’t very intuitive. However, since you explained the function of the “Add category contents” button, it’s become a lot clearer to me how this script is supposed to work and to be utilized by us. In short, Ozzie, it is awesome!! I have had a long-as-my-arm list of category namespace clean-ups since the dinosaurs roamed the earth. But, I prefer working on my iPad to using my laptop. So, I’d kept putting off, and putting off, using AWB to do those tasks. Well, the MassCategorization script lets me do them all with my little iPad. Thanks!! :) — SpikeToronto 11:55, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
P.S. I would suggest devising a small chart/table that distinguishes MassCategorization from CategoryRenameAuto-update. When to use which script is not immediately obvious or easily understood. Thanks! :) — SpikeToronto 11:55, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

P.P.S. Now that I understand the “Add category contents” button, it makes my tag/codeword suggestion earlier moot. Just toss that one in the bin! :$ — SpikeToronto 11:57, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

Occasional error message

Every so often I get the error message: The page "PAGENAME" could not be created due to error code: "emptypage"

Any idea what this is?

The last one I got this was for w:c:braceface:Category:Villians which I want to rename to "Antagonists", and is misspelled anyway. --Love Robin (talk) 06:30, August 13, 2014 (UTC)

Again, really late, but I've fixed it. If a category page is empty it now adds a period as I don't know how to actually make an empty page (and it's not obvious). — Foodbandlt (talk) 06:40, December 22, 2014 (UTC)

Page Rename

will there be equivalent for page renames? ie change all links on "what links here" Reasno 杰诺斯·史林特 04:03, August 26, 2014 (UTC)

I'll make it conditionally update links as well at some point. I didn't get to it tonight.Foodbandlt (talk) 06:41, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
I think I misunderstood you, actually. PageRenameAuto-update might be what you're looking for. — Foodbandlt (talk) 19:28, December 22, 2014 (UTC)

User group restrictons

Would it be possible to restrict this script to sysops-only? Perhaps as a variable preceding the import statement in Common.js. Thanks! :) — SpikeToronto 05:56, November 18, 2014 (UTC)

I would disagree with that notion on the Dev Wiki script because I know some wikis who use the script and are not sysop. I would suggest adding that yourself to your own version of the script somewhere. – Ozuzanna 19:06, November 18, 2014 (UTC)
One would have to know JS to do that… :( Would it be possible to alter the dev script so that, just above the import over at another wiki, there could be some parameter setting/value that limits the user groups for which the script operates? It could default to autoconfirmed if no parameter is supplied at the importing wiki. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 02:58, November 26, 2014 (UTC)
Instead of altering the script, you could add a conditional in your import, like so:
if (mw.config.get('wgUserGroups').indexOf('sysop') > -1) {
    importScriptPage('CategoryRenameAuto-update/code.js', 'dev');
}
-- sqm talk 14:03, 11.26.2014
[edit]→ Or, add the import to mediaWiki:group-sysop.js. -- sqm talk 14:07, 11.26.2014
That’s perfect! I’ll give that a try. Thanks! :) — SpikeToronto 08:08, December 2, 2014 (UTC)
It just occurred to me, though, that that will not prevent someone from adding CategoryRenameAuto-update to their personal JS and running it. Will it? — SpikeToronto 08:18, December 2, 2014 (UTC)
No, it won't. There are ways to prevent it on a per wiki basis, but there are way to get around it just with minimal js knowledge.
For example, the author of this could add a check for a global config that disables the import for non-sysops. But the user could just unset that config before importing it. Another option would be to add the restriction to the code, but then I could just copy the code to another location and remove that restriction.
Perhaps a lot of users lack the knowledge to do wither of those examples, but if I can think of ways around it I'm sure someone else can. cqm 11:17, 3 Dec 2014 (UTC)
Anyone whose javascript knowledge is at that level is not someone one has to worry about messing things up inadvertently. ;) — SpikeToronto 06:35, December 15, 2014 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Some people may use scripts in order to vandalize. Undoing the renaming of a bunch of category pages can be hard, especially if the person or people undoing do not use a bot or a script.
PapíDimmi (talk | contribs) 15:25, July 13, 2016 (UTC)

Error code

I tested the CategoryRenameAuto-update script on Test 12 Wiki and received the following error message for some, but not all, of the pages that were re-categorised:

The page at test-12.wikia.com says:

The page "<page name>" could not be submitted because of error code:"internal_api_error_DBQueryError". Please update the link(s) on that page manually.

Could someone please explain why these errors occurred and if they're significant? --LegendFPS (Talk) (Contribs) 06:28, December 2, 2014 (UTC)

That's likely a error in wikia's config or code, it's not a standard api error code afaik. I'd suggest trying again in a couple of days to see if it's fixed. cqm 10:28, 2 Dec 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I'll do that. Thanks. --LegendFPS (Talk) (Contribs) 06:46, December 3, 2014 (UTC)
It worked fine on the second attempt. --LêgêndFPŠ (Talk) (Edits) 03:06, December 9, 2014 (UTC)

Non-English languages

The script doesn't seem to work on non-English wikias. Could someone please try and fix this ? Thank you in advance. —Hulothe @fandom 16:26, December 21, 2014 (UTC)

I'll try to get this done today. I might need help with translation for some things though if you're willing to help. — Foodbandlt (talk) 19:01, December 21, 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. I'm willing to help with translations. —Hulothe @fandom 21:51, December 21, 2014 (UTC)
Multilingual support update is now up, it just needs translations. Sorry this took so long. There was a lot more text than I originally thought there was. — Foodbandlt (talk) 06:42, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
I added fr, it works great ! Thank you very much. I will add some other languages if I'm able to. —Hulothe @fandom 10:26, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
I thought that, in order to not have the script become too long, we make separate versions per language, like
  • CategoryRenameAuto-update/code.js
  • CategoryRenameAuto-update/fr/code.js
  • CategoryRenameAuto-update/pl/code.js
  • CategoryRenameAuto-update/de/code.js
  • etc.
Or, does that not apply in this case. (confused) :) — SpikeToronto 15:22, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
I actually don't know, this is the first script that I've ever included multiple language support on. A couple that I looked at didn't split it up but mentioned it. I'll look around, thanks Spike! — Foodbandlt (talk) 15:33, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
You’re welcome! :) — SpikeToronto 15:57, December 22, 2014 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────All right, the languages have been split to separate pages and only the one that's needed is loaded. You might find it to take about a half-second longer to load as a result. — Foodbandlt (talk) 18:42, December 24, 2014 (UTC)

That’s brilliant Foodie. Thanks! :) — SpikeToronto 11:44, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
It seems like for any language that doesn't have a translation ready, it hangs while trying to load the file since it doesn't exist. Could it be made to default to English in such cases?Robo Kiss (talk) 21:11, April 19, 2015 (UTC)
I see bits of code like
if (typeof CRA.supportedLanguages.indexOf(mediaWiki.config.get('wgUserLanguage')) == -1){
					var userLang = "en";

where it seems like what I said is the intended behavior, but I guess something is off. Should this line

url: "http://dev.wikia.com/wiki/CategoryRenameAuto-update/" + mediaWiki.config.get('wgContentLanguage') + ".js?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript",

instead be using userLang in the middle?Robo Kiss (talk) 22:13, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

The content language pack being available is a prerequisite to loading the user language pack (if different) because it needs the translation of the Category namespace name. In hindsight I've found a way to get that without a language pack since then. I'll look into changing that. — Foodbandlt (talk) 12:59, April 20, 2015 (UTC)

(Adding a tricky issue) Um... is it possible to make non-English wikis load the English version if their languages isn't currently available? I was originally thinking to translate that to Chinese as it is recommended, but the character variations as well as phrase usage differences hold me back. :( TsukiYaksha月夜叉 Forest Spirit of the Moon 07:12, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

Yes it is possible, though I need to make some changes to the script. When I first wrote it I wasn't aware that Mediawiki offered translated namespace names in a variable, so I required the native language translation for a wiki. So I need to make a few changes, though I don't really have time to do it at the moment. I'll try to get to this. — Foodbandlt (talk) 12:49, July 16, 2015 (UTC)

Why piping?!

Why is it “piping” the categories it changes on the changed categories’ constituent pages? For example, see http://sp.wikia.com/?diff=1658655

This raises serious issues:

  1. The righthand-side of the pipe in a category is used to specify sort order.


    • Thus, the “Cindy Lou Who” page (see example) categorized as

[[Category:Characters with antlers|Characters with a antlers]]
means that on the “Characters with antlers” page, it files not by “cindy …”, but by “characters …”

    • “cindy” and “characters” are alphabetically close, but suppose that the page being categorized thusly were instead called “Thomas the Tank Engine”


      • the page would slot in under the C’s — as in “characters” — instead or under the T’s — as in “Thomas”.
    • It’s really up to each wiki’s categorization policy to determine the sort order of its articles.
  1. It is counterintuitive to use a pipe to continue to show the category on the page as it was — in this case, the incorrect "characters with a antlers” — especially since “as it was” was wrong and renamed for that reason. ← (It doesn't really do this anyway: it's all about sort order right of the pipe. :P)
  2. Compounding this issue, editors at our wiki have begin copying the method — unnecessarily piping categories — yet having zero understanding of the consequences of piping them. Moreover, the two sides of the pipe often bear no resemblance to each other, or any relation to the page on which it is placed! For example,
    [[Category:Horror films|Turtle McGurtle]]
    on a page about Friday the 13th! You can imagine the chaos this is creating.

Thanks. — SpikeToronto 13:06, December 22, 2014 (UTC)

Ahh, you're right. I hadn't considered it because MLP Wiki doesn't generally ever use pipes in categories other than when Wikia bugs pop up. Would you suggest that I remove the pipe and text after it, then? Or be able to specify what should come after the pipe? — Foodbandlt (talk) 14:00, December 22, 2014 (UTC)
@Foodie: It should just replace the category, no pipe. So, in the example above,
[[Category:Characters with a antlers]]
would just become
[[Category:Characters with antlers]]
without the extra a. This is essentially how one would do it if one were doing it manually. (By the way, on one wiki, we use sort order a lot, most often in the form
[[Category:{{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}|{{SUBST:SUBPAGENAME}}]]
to ensure that the category pages list the entries correctly. Anyway, thanks for fixing this! :) — SpikeToronto 15:14, December 22, 2014 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── It’s official ==> I’m an idiot. :$ — SpikeToronto 15:53, December 22, 2014 (UTC)

Links to category on page

(See EDIT 2 too)
I found something thats prevents the script from working as it should: if a link to the category being renamed is already present on the page, then the script will only change this one instead of the actual category. An example here. What it should have done corresponds to the next change that I've made manually. Could you please try and find a solution to this problem? Thank you again for your great work. —Hulothe @fandom 22:58, December 22, 2014 (UTC)

EDIT : if, by the way, it could replace (optionally, by checking a checkbox) all the links to this category on any page just like does FileUsageAuto-update for images, it'd be great, too :-)

EDIT 2 : It seems that the error mentionned above doesn't affect only links to the category, but every single word that is the same as the category name (not incuding Category:). You can see an example here.

Hah, that's odd. It looks like when I copied the page processing function from FileUsageAuto-update I omitted the multiple replacements part. I'll work on including that. As for the wrong word replacement, holy crap. It looks like I missed a part of the regex when I adapted it as well. I guess I can blame that on half-spirited coding in the beginning when I was porting it to work with categories. I'll fix that asap. Thanks for the reports to make the script better! — Foodbandlt (talk) 00:02, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I've fixed what you described here (hopefully). I'm not as familiar with category use cases as I am with image use cases. If you find a use case that it missed if you wouldn't mind leaving a link here so I can update the regex I would appreciate it. Working on link updating now. Thanks! — Foodbandlt (talk) 02:40, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
All right, it's done and uploaded. There are two new messages to translate if you wouldn't mind (marked with // NEEDS TRANSLATION under fr). One unfortunate part about these being categories and not images is that when a category name is used without it's surrounding brackets, like in a template parameter, there's no easy way to tell the difference between regular words and a category name. Generally those are edge cases as from what I've seen people call that bad practice, but regardless it still happens. I've removed that part of the regex so that it doesn't touch anything that's not inside of double brackets for now until we find more (obvious) use cases. Thanks for all of your help and feedback! — Foodbandlt (talk) 05:15, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Error

Currently this script is giving me an error and breaking my JS - the console reads "ReferenceError: LIR is not defined". – Ozuzanna 13:53, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

And this is why copy-pasting is dangerous. Lol. Thanks Oz! — Foodbandlt (talk) 15:43, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion : default summary

Hi :) I've been using the script a lot and I think that it could be improved by allowing the use of a custom default edit summary.

By the way, Happy New Year! —Hulothe @fandom 22:16, January 1, 2015 (UTC)

PS : I'm very often (each time tbh) getting this error from the API : "internal_api_error_DBQueryError". It's very weird, the category on page does actually change but the pages for which I get this error stays in the old one. When mae=ke a manual change to categories on the page, it fixes the "bug".

All right, I've sent an S:C to Wikia about the API error for clarification. About the edit summary, are you talking about the "Updating Category:Blah -> Category:Blahh (automatic) summary when editing a page? Would you prefer to use the same reason that you input on the rename page? Or would you rather have a default specified before you import the script? If you want to specify a new default in a variable before the script, would being able to use the old and new category name be useful? — Foodbandlt (talk) 23:40, January 2, 2015 (UTC)
Wikia responded saying that they need more information about the error (which I honestly didn't know that there was). I've updated the script to include the error information in the message if you wouldn't mind copy-pasting the entire error message next time you come across it. It should be in the form of "Error code; error info". I'll send it to Wikia once I have that. Thanks! — Foodbandlt (talk) 19:51, January 5, 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply. What I mean is the #wpReason textarea, to be defined in a variable before the script. "Updating Category:Blah -> Category:Blahh (automatic)" summary for pages edits is fine. Maybe it would be useful to use this as a default summary for #wpReason, but sill make it customizable. Ok for the error, I hope someone will be able to fix that! —Hulothe @fandom 07:11, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

Alternative to Delete

It's not always the case that a bot is also an admin, which can mean old categories left undeleted. How about an option so that rather than deleting a category page or leaving it alone, its contents are replaced with {{Delete}} or something similar so it can be swept up later?JoshuaJSlone (talk) 14:16, January 21, 2015 (UTC)

Done. I've added the option to define what to replace the page contents with, rather than hard-coding it in. Let me know if you have any other suggestions or issues, thanks! — Foodbandlt (talk) 16:12, January 21, 2015 (UTC)

Still working?

Is this still working for anyone? I'm not sure when the last time I used it was, but I no longer see the Rename option on category pages.JoshuaJSlone (talk) 14:51, September 30, 2015 (UTC)

It appears to be working for me. What page are you on that it doesn't appear? — Foodbandlt (talk) 15:46, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, seems I've barked up the wrong tree. This is the symptom I noticed, but it seems like none of the scripts in my bot account's global.js are loading right now for some reason.JoshuaJSlone (talk) 17:51, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
That was a recent chance that Wikia made. You need to check a checkbox in your bot's preferences to enable personal javascript. — Foodbandlt (talk) 17:56, September 30, 2015 (UTC)
Aha, that's it! I remember doing so for my main account, but forgot to for that one.JoshuaJSlone (talk) 18:05, September 30, 2015 (UTC)

Code PT_BR (BRAZILIAN)

add the code http://dev.wikia.com/wiki/MediaWiki:CategoryRenameAuto-update/pt-br.js

Done. Thanks for contributing! — Foodbandlt (talk) 16:36, January 28, 2016 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.