This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MassProtect page.
- Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (
~~~~). - Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- If you're new to the wiki, please take a look at the talk page help.
- Be polite
- Assume good faith
- Be welcoming
The following options should be added[]
- Autoconfirmed (edit) Admin (move) Admin (upload)
- Admin (edit) Autoconfirmed (move)
In-fact I would recommend that everything that's not already available with this script that is available with the default protection settings should be added so that it's consistent. I find the "Autoconfirmed (edit) Admin (move) Admin (upload)" protection settings to be especially handy for images that I upload. It would be a lot faster than having to do it manually. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 02:08, November 11, 2017 (UTC)
- Added the two bullet points above, should be live when JS review passes. --Sophie 03:17, November 11, 2017 (UTC)
Add category contents doesn't work if the categories only contain images and templates[]
It really would be nice the script could be modified slightly so that the add category contents button can work on categories that contain images and templates. Since it only works on categories that have at least one page in the category. Which complicates trying to quickly protect or unprotect hundreds of images and templates. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 03:44, April 14, 2018 (UTC)
- Fixed - it was not just images and templates but any category. It would not work if the list of titles was changed or focused on. noreplyz 01:37, April 16, 2018 (UTC)
Odd occurrence[]
Hi, so I've just installed and somewhat successfully used this script. I say "somewhat" because, while the protection was performed without a problem, I entered "1 week" for "Expiry time:" and "temporary protection; prepping for upcoming merge, preventing untimely image replacement." for "Reason:", and after the action was performed, the expire setting was "infinite", and with no action summary shown as I previously typed, not on Special:Recentchanges or individual file histories. Am wondering if this can be fixed, because I'd hate for people thinking I'm randomly protecting images, especially when I had tried to specify why the action was done and should be temporary. Thanks! --Sammm✦✧(talk) 23:44, February 9, 2019 (UTC)
- Could you link me to where this happened so I can see what caused the issue. Patrik 01:55, February 10, 2019 (UTC)
- The latest 17 items on the log was performed with this script (with the info provided above not showing up or used); no idea what else to show you. =/ --Sammm✦✧(talk) 03:22, February 10, 2019 (UTC)
┌──────┘
Devastated lol. Just performed with this script on the latest 12 items on the log; input the same thing as I did that failed last time, and it still isn't working properly. I have cleared my cache several times before actually using the script, so I'm not sure what's going on. I am only protecting "upload" from regular users, is that a factor because it's not protection from editing? No editing summary is still troubling though. =/
--Sammm✦✧(talk) 01:50, February 12, 2019 (UTC)
- The script worked fine for me, protecting a file page
upload=autoconfirmedfor1 weekwith a protection reason. My guess is that either the new version hadn't been approved yet or that due to cache you were still using the old version. If you try again, it should work, but you might want to add?debug=1to the URL just in case, to make sure cache isn't causing any problems. Patrik 14:58, February 12, 2019 (UTC)
Error Work[]
Why when I put articles and specify all the protection fields, but there is a protection error? I know that I have a Ukrainian project, and this script works well (I checked it when protecting the template). Articles added through category.
Lifefe Це моє життя!Это моя жизнь! 16:05, August 13, 2019 (UTC)
- What is the error in English? Also, can you link me to the page that was not protected and tell me what settings you used? Patrik 16:21, August 13, 2019 (UTC)
Mass Unprotect[]
Is there any way to mass unprotect with this script? ❄ Glaciersong ♪♫ 01:13, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Setting the protection level to "allow all users" should fully unprotected the listed pages. ~ ՏԹՄՐ (✉ • ✎) 11:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Comments protection[]
If you protect a page using a bot and set "Comment" to "Allow only autoconfirmed users", the setting reverts to "Allow all users" anyway as soon as you edit the page yourself. ~Mustafar29 (text me back here) 11:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Allow to change default settings[]
Hi! Thanks for this tool. Is there a reason you don't surface the default settings in the window object like WHAM, or anywhere you prefer? It'd be nice to adjust stuff to adapt them in cases of repetitive ban-evading bots.
Reason for (un)protection, what's blocked with what level of blockage, etc. All custom, or at a minimum the reason and the edit rights.
Thanks either way! =) — Haximus Thunderburp (talk), 3 October 2023